Thursday, December 10, 2009
Launching my Campaign for a Playoff
As part of my Writing and Rhetoric class I need to construct an argument regarding anything I choose. I had to choose a medium and a cause. I chose to create a website/blog using Twitter, Facebook and email to spread the word about this project. Please take some time to look around and give me your input. You can email me at vincent.moreschini@colorado.edu or tweet me at @timbe2.
Today begins my argument for the Bowl Championship Subdivision (BCS) to change to a playoff system. I think I have the right solution. The recent situation of TCU and Boise State being chosen to participate in the Fiesta Bowl is a real disappointment. Two non-BCS teams bust into the BCS Bowls, and they force the two teams to play each other. This is a lose-lose for the BCS and every college football fan. We all wanted to see a BCS team, play a non-BCS team, and now we have been robbed of this opportunity. Keep checking out the blog and please leave comments.
History of Eligible BCS Busters
Season | Team | Conference | Regular Season Record | BCS Rank |
1998 | Tulane* | CUSA | 11-0 | #10 |
1999 | Marshall* | MAC | 12-0 | #12 |
2000 | TCU* | CUSA | 10-1 | #14 |
2003 | Miami (OH)* | MAC | 11-1 | #11 |
2004 | Utah | MWC | 11-0 | #6 |
2004 | Boise State** | WAC | 11-0 | #9 |
2005 | TCU* | MWC | 11-1 | #14 |
2006 | Boise State | WAC | 12-0 | #8 |
2007 | Hawaii | WAC | 12-0 | #10 |
2008 | Utah | MWC | 12-0 | #6 |
2008 | Boise State** | WAC | 12-0 | #9 |
2008 | TCU** | MWC | 10-2 | #11 |
2009 | Boise State | WAC | 13-0 | #6 |
2009 | BYU** | MWC | 10-2 | #14 |
2009 | TCU | MWC | 12-0 | #4 |
* Would have qualified for an automatic selection to a BCS bowl under post-2005 criteria, and was at the time eligible for an "at-large" selection, but was not chosen.
** Was eligible for an "at-large" selection but was not chosen.
And Where those BCS Busters Ended up
Season | Team | BCS Bowl | Result | Final Ranking | ||||
AP | Coaches | |||||||
1998 | Tulane* | #7 | #7 | |||||
1999 | Marshall* | #10 | #10 | |||||
2000 | TCU* | #21 | #18 | |||||
2003 | Miami (OH)* | #10 | #12 | |||||
2004 | Utah | Fiesta Bowl | Utah | 35 | Pittsburgh | 7 | #4 | #5 |
2004 | Boise State** | #12 | #13 | |||||
2005 | TCU* | #11 | #9 | |||||
2006 | Boise State | Fiesta Bowl | Boise State | 43 | Oklahoma | 42 | #5 | #6 |
2007 | Hawaii | Sugar Bowl | Georgia | 41 | Hawaii | 10 | #19 | #17 |
2008 | Utah | Sugar Bowl | Utah | 31 | Alabama | 17 | #2 | #4 |
2008 | Boise State** | #11 | #13 | |||||
2008 | TCU** | #7 | #7 | |||||
2009 | Boise State | Fiesta Bowl | TBD | TBD | ||||
2009 | BYU** | TBD | TBD | |||||
2009 | TCU | Fiesta Bowl | TBD | TBD |
* Would have qualified for an automatic selection to a BCS bowl under post-2005 criteria, and was at the time eligible for an "at-large" selection, but was not chosen.
** Was eligible for an "at-large" selection but was not chosen.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
1998-2008 Highs and Lows of the non-BCS Busters
Below (in the two graphs I have displayed) there are 15 different examples of how the BCS has not treated undefeated teams from the non-BCS fairly. In 1998, Tulane finished the season with a record of 11-0, was ranked #7 in the country for BCS and yet was left out of all 5 BIG GAMES: The FedEx Orange Bowl, The All-State Sugar Bowl, The Tostitas Fiesta Bowl, The Citi Rose Bowl, and the National Championship game presented by Citi.
This also happened to Marshall in 1999 when they went 12-0, TCU in 2000 when they went 10-1, and in 2003 Miami Ohio when they went 11-1.
Not until 2004 did this change when Utah made it to the big show. Utah went 11-0 ranked #6 in the BCS and squashed Pittsburgh in the Fiesta Bowl, 35-7. The next two years 2004 and 2005 Boise State and TCU were left out respectfully. Boise State going 11-0 while TCU went 11-1.
2006 was a big turn of events for non-BCS teams in the BCS. An undefeated Boise State team went 12-0 and ended up being matched up with Oklahoma(a big BCS powerhouse)in the Fiesta Bowl. I don't want to spoil the excitement of what happened(video to come in next post), but nevertheless, Boise State ended up winning and really stating a case for non-BCS teams to be allowed to play in BCS games.
In 2007 non-BCS teams Hawaii made it to the big games. Hawaii ended up losing 41-10 to the Georgia Bulldogs. This really left the media skeptical of the WAC(Western Athletic Conference) (non-BCS) teams.
In 2008 there were three eligible teams, yet only one made it to the game. Utah 12-0, Boise State 12-0, and TCU 10-2 all had strong campaigns for a BCS bowl, but Utah was the only one to make one where they beat Alabama 31-17.
This also happened to Marshall in 1999 when they went 12-0, TCU in 2000 when they went 10-1, and in 2003 Miami Ohio when they went 11-1.
Not until 2004 did this change when Utah made it to the big show. Utah went 11-0 ranked #6 in the BCS and squashed Pittsburgh in the Fiesta Bowl, 35-7. The next two years 2004 and 2005 Boise State and TCU were left out respectfully. Boise State going 11-0 while TCU went 11-1.
2006 was a big turn of events for non-BCS teams in the BCS. An undefeated Boise State team went 12-0 and ended up being matched up with Oklahoma(a big BCS powerhouse)in the Fiesta Bowl. I don't want to spoil the excitement of what happened(video to come in next post), but nevertheless, Boise State ended up winning and really stating a case for non-BCS teams to be allowed to play in BCS games.
In 2007 non-BCS teams Hawaii made it to the big games. Hawaii ended up losing 41-10 to the Georgia Bulldogs. This really left the media skeptical of the WAC(Western Athletic Conference) (non-BCS) teams.
In 2008 there were three eligible teams, yet only one made it to the game. Utah 12-0, Boise State 12-0, and TCU 10-2 all had strong campaigns for a BCS bowl, but Utah was the only one to make one where they beat Alabama 31-17.
Labels:
bcs,
boise state,
busters,
fiesta,
georgia,
hawaii,
marshall,
miami (oh),
orange,
pittsburgh,
rose,
sugar,
tcu
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)