This is one of the top 5 games I have ever watched in my life! Boise State v. Oklahoma. 2006. Fiesta Bowl. Glendale, Arizona. Remarkable! Incredible! Every time I watch it, I get chills. Enough of me, here is how it all broke down. Boise State went 12-0 while Oklahoma went 11-2. The whole game was back and forth. The last two(the ladies..or people who love seeing two people in love could say 3)plays was absolutely remarkable. The first play being a hook and ladder to tie the score and send the game to OT. And to win the game for the Broncos Jared Zabransky faked it to the right with an empty hand then handed the ball off(behind his back) to RB, Ian Johnson for the touchdown! The next play, Johnson proposes to his longtime girlfriend and Boise State cheerleader, Chrissy Popadics. Check it all out below! It was such a great day for Broncos fans and made a great case for non-BCS teams to get into the BCS games for next year.
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Sure, they make BCS Bowls Occasionally, But Did you Notice..
THAT NONE OF THE NON-BCS TEAMS THAT PLAY IN A BCS BOWL HAVE EVER MADE THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME!? Over the past 9 years there have been 10 non-BCS teams go undefeated and not make the BCS National Championship Game. Of those 10, 6 did make a BCS Bowl though, a pretty weak consolation when a team that has 1 or 2 losses does make it to the National Championship game during that same year.
A parody of how the selection committee chooses the BCS participants.
No one Wants to Play Boise..For Good Reason
Here is the reasoning. It is pretty well known that teams from the WAC, CUSA, MAC, and MWC do not have as strong of schedules as say, teams from the Big 12, Big 10, SEC, or PAC 10. This is a contribution to why non-BCS teams are kept out of the National Championship game in Pasadena, CA. But just this football season, it was announced that Boise State was looking for some more BCS teams to fill their 2011 schedule, and no one wanted to play them(See quotation/article below). Boise State is a beast of a football program! Quite the dynasty.
"So what is on the table for the BCS opponent? The BCS team gets to stay at home (if they choose), they will be compensated, and they get to show their prowess over the lowly WAC one more time."
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/284222-boise-state-attacked-for-soft-schedule-but-no-bcs-teams-will-play-them
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/284222-boise-state-attacked-for-soft-schedule-but-no-bcs-teams-will-play-them
Boise State Broncos Team History
Junior College Record: 199-61-9 (.757)
University Record: 353-143-2 (.709)
WAC Record: 68-4 (.944)
Division I FBS Bowl Record: 5-4 (.555)
BCS Record: 1-0 (1.000)
National Championships (2)
1958 (JC), 1980 (I-AA)
Big Sky Conference Championships (6)
1973, 1974, 1975, 1977, 1980, 1994
Big West Conference Championships (2)
1999, 2000
Western Athletic Conference Championships (7)
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009
Example of the Different Polls: Harris, Coaches, BCS
BCS Standings - Updated: December 6, 2009 | |||||||||||
RK | Team | W-L | Harris | Coaches | CPU % | BCS | |||||
RK | Points | % | RK | Points | % | Prev | Avg | ||||
1 | Alabama | 13-0 | 1 | 2841 | .9968 | 1 | 1470 | .9966 | 1.0000 | 2 | .998 |
2 | Texas | 13-0 | 2 | 2721 | .9547 | 2 | 1409 | .9553 | .9200 | 3 | .943 |
3 | Cincinnati | 12-0 | 4 | 2467 | .8656 | 4 | 1280 | .8678 | .9300 | 5 | .888 |
4 | TCU | 12-0 | 3 | 2579 | .9049 | 3 | 1336 | .9058 | .8400 | 4 | .884 |
5 | Florida | 12-1 | 5 | 2395 | .8404 | 5 | 1240 | .8407 | .9100 | 1 | .864 |
6 | Boise State | 13-0 | 6 | 2358 | .8274 | 6 | 1216 | .8244 | .7800 | 6 | .811 |
7 | Oregon | 10-2 | 7 | 2130 | .7474 | 7 | 1096 | .7431 | .7800 | 7 | .757 |
8 | Ohio State | 10-2 | 8 | 2081 | .7302 | 8 | 1077 | .7302 | .5100 | 8 | .657 |
9 | Georgia Tech | 11-2 | 10 | 1787 | .6270 | 10 | 921 | .6244 | .6900 | 10 | .649 |
10 | Iowa | 10-2 | 11 | 1772 | .6218 | 11 | 918 | .6224 | .6100 | 9 | .618 |
11 | Virginia Tech | 9-3 | 12 | 1569 | .5505 | 12 | 829 | .5620 | .5900 | 12 | .568 |
12 | LSU | 9-3 | 13 | 1384 | .4856 | 13 | 718 | .4868 | .6400 | 13 | .537 |
13 | Penn State | 10-2 | 9 | 1800 | .6316 | 9 | 950 | .6441 | .3200 | 11 | .532 |
14 | Brigham Young | 10-2 | 14 | 1349 | .4733 | 14 | 702 | .4759 | .4100 | 14 | .453 |
15 | Miami (FL) | 9-3 | 15 | 1173 | .4116 | 15 | 611 | .4142 | .5000 | 17 | .442 |
16 | West Virginia | 9-3 | 18 | 730 | .2561 | 17 | 429 | .2908 | .4600 | 23 | .336 |
17 | Pittsburgh | 9-3 | 16 | 995 | .3491 | 16 | 506 | .3431 | .2500 | 15 | .314 |
18 | Oregon State | 8-4 | 19 | 722 | .2533 | 20 | 368 | .2495 | .3600 | 16 | .288 |
19 | Oklahoma State | 9-3 | 17 | 839 | .2944 | 18 | 404 | .2739 | .2200 | 20 | .263 |
20 | Arizona | 8-4 | 24 | 381 | .1337 | 23 | 237 | .1607 | .3800 | 0 | .225 |
21 | Stanford | 8-4 | 21 | 625 | .2193 | 21 | 253 | .1715 | .1500 | 24 | .180 |
22 | Nebraska | 9-4 | 20 | 631 | .2214 | 19 | 391 | .2651 | .0100 | 22 | .165 |
23 | Utah | 9-3 | 22 | 511 | .1793 | 24 | 183 | .1241 | .0700 | 25 | .124 |
24 | USC | 8-4 | 26 | 124 | .0435 | 27 | 42 | .0285 | .2900 | 18 | .121 |
25 | Wisconsin | 9-3 | 23 | 409 | .1435 | 22 | 247 | .1675 | .0500 | 0 | .120 |
Polls Explained: Harris, Coaches, BCS
I. Harris Interactive Poll (1/3rd)
Replaces the AP Poll. The first poll will be released September 27, then weekly through December 6. A team's score in the Harrispoll will be divided by 2,850, which is the maximum number of points any team can receive if all 114 voting members rank the same team as Number 1. Example: 2,850 / 2,850 = 1.0. If a team receives a total of 114 voting points, an average of 25th place, their BCS quotient of this component would be .04. (1.0 / 25 = 0.04).
II. Coaches Poll (1/3rd)
A team's score in the USA Today poll will be divided by 1,475, which is the maximum number of points any team can receive if all 59 voting members rank the same team as Number 1. Example: 1,475 / 1,475 = 1.0. If a team receives a total of 59 voting points, an average of 25th place, their BCS quotient of this component would be .04. (1.0 / 25 = 0.04).
(Better understanding the polls: In both human polls, voting members fill out their own top 25 rankings ballot. Each team receives 1-25 points in reverse order of the way they are ranked. The 25th place team on each ballot receives 1 point, 24th place gets 2 points, 23rd receives 3 points... first place receives 25 points. This inverse point order is also applied to the computer rankings.
In the Harris Interactive College Football Poll and USA Today Coaches Poll, a team will be evaluated on the number of voting points it receives in each poll. The number of actual voters, which can vary and has varied in the past, is figured into the computation on a weekly basis in stating each team's percentage of a possible perfect score.
III. Computer rankings (1/3rd)
The computer rankings percentage is calculated by dropping the highest and lowest ranking for each team and then dividing the remaining total by 100, the maximum possible points. (Example: the 6 rankers have Team A ranked 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, and 4. Take away the 2 and 4 which leaves an average of 3rd place. The BCS quotient of this component would be 0.92. (23 / 25 = 0.92).
Simplifying the formula
The percentage totals of the Harris Interactive Poll, USA Today Poll, and the computer rankings are then averaged. The teams’ averages are ranked to produce the BCS Standings.
A = Team is No. 1 in Harris Poll with all voters = 1.000
B = Same team is No. 1 in Coaches Poll with all voters = 1.000
C = Same team is No. 3 in Computer Rankings = 0.920
Result: (A+B+C)/3 = Total Score of 0.973
http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/bcs_explained.html
http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/polls
Replaces the AP Poll. The first poll will be released September 27, then weekly through December 6. A team's score in the Harris
II. Coaches Poll (1/3rd)
A team's score in the USA Today poll will be divided by 1,475, which is the maximum number of points any team can receive if all 59 voting members rank the same team as Number 1. Example: 1,475 / 1,475 = 1.0. If a team receives a total of 59 voting points, an average of 25th place, their BCS quotient of this component would be .04. (1.0 / 25 = 0.04).
(Better understanding the polls: In both human polls, voting members fill out their own top 25 rankings ballot. Each team receives 1-25 points in reverse order of the way they are ranked. The 25th place team on each ballot receives 1 point, 24th place gets 2 points, 23rd receives 3 points... first place receives 25 points. This inverse point order is also applied to the computer rankings.
In the Harris Interactive College Football Poll and USA Today Coaches Poll, a team will be evaluated on the number of voting points it receives in each poll. The number of actual voters, which can vary and has varied in the past, is figured into the computation on a weekly basis in stating each team's percentage of a possible perfect score.
III. Computer rankings (1/3rd)
The computer rankings percentage is calculated by dropping the highest and lowest ranking for each team and then dividing the remaining total by 100, the maximum possible points. (Example: the 6 rankers have Team A ranked 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, and 4. Take away the 2 and 4 which leaves an average of 3rd place. The BCS quotient of this component would be 0.92. (23 / 25 = 0.92).
The percentage totals of the Harris Interactive Poll, USA Today Poll, and the computer rankings are then averaged. The teams’ averages are ranked to produce the BCS Standings.
A = Team is No. 1 in Harris Poll with all voters = 1.000
B = Same team is No. 1 in Coaches Poll with all voters = 1.000
C = Same team is No. 3 in Computer Rankings = 0.920
Result: (A+B+C)/3 = Total Score of 0.973
http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/bcs_explained.html
http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/polls
The Case of the "Mythical" Champion
This can lead to alot of problems for the BCS. Here's a situation: LSU beat Oklahoma 21-17 but USC was voted #1 by the AP poll after a 28-14 win over Michigan in the Rose Bowl in 2003.
Here are some other situations where this happened:
Pre-BCS Split "Mythical" Titles
1954 Ohio State (AP), UCLA (UPI Coaches Poll)
1957 Auburn (AP), Ohio State (UPI Coaches Poll)
1965 Alabama (AP), Michigan State (UPI Coaches Poll)
1970 Nebraska (AP), Texas (UPI Coaches Poll)
1973 Notre Dame (AP), Alabama (UPI Coaches Poll)
1974 Oklahoma (AP), Southern California (UPI Coaches Poll)
1978 Alabama (AP), Southern California (UPI Coaches Poll)
1990 Colorado (AP), Georgia Tech (UPI Coaches Poll) YAY COLORADO BUFFALOES! :)
1991 Miami, Fla. (AP), Washington (USA Today/CNN Coaches Poll)
1994 Nebraska (AP, USA Today/ESPN Coaches Poll)
1997 Michigan (AP), Nebraska (USA Today/ESPN Coaches Poll)
http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/bcs_explained.html
http://image.cdnl3.xosnetwork.com/pics/200/BS/BSOOGLKLYMBAXST.20081017154751.jpg
Here are some other situations where this happened:
Pre-BCS Split "Mythical" Titles
1954 Ohio State (AP), UCLA (UPI Coaches Poll)
1957 Auburn (AP), Ohio State (UPI Coaches Poll)
1965 Alabama (AP), Michigan State (UPI Coaches Poll)
1970 Nebraska (AP), Texas (UPI Coaches Poll)
1973 Notre Dame (AP), Alabama (UPI Coaches Poll)
1974 Oklahoma (AP), Southern California (UPI Coaches Poll)
1978 Alabama (AP), Southern California (UPI Coaches Poll)
1990 Colorado (AP), Georgia Tech (UPI Coaches Poll) YAY COLORADO BUFFALOES! :)
1991 Miami, Fla. (AP), Washington (USA Today/CNN Coaches Poll)
1994 Nebraska (AP, USA Today/ESPN Coaches Poll)
1997 Michigan (AP), Nebraska (USA Today/ESPN Coaches Poll)
http://image.cdnl3.xosnetwork.com/pics/200/BS/BSOOGLKLYMBAXST.20081017154751.jpg
The Solution -- 16 Team Playoff
This is the idea of the Playoff I would suggest. Of course the teams would be decided by polls, but the winner of the whole season will not be decided by the polls. While the Top 16 teams in the country will play for the Championship, the other teams will play the Bowls like normal, still allowing teams to play their meaningless games, which still allow everyone to make money.
The National Championship game will still be played in Pasadena, CA and it will be called the Rose Bowl. The Fiesta Bowl and the Orange Bowl will be kept to be played in the Final Four. The Elite Eight will have the Sugar Bowl and the Cotton Bowl. The 16 format will have the Gator, Outback, Capital One, Chick-Fil-A, Insight, Texas, Brut Sun, and the Pacific Life Holiday Bowl.
Obviously all connections will be severed from each respectable conference to allow this playoff to occur.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/ncaa/08/11/bowl-schedule/index.html
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/ncaa/11/22/college.football.poll/index.html
http://football.about.com/od/bowlchampionship/i/bcsvsplayoffs.htm
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/ncaa/08/11/bowl-schedule/index.html
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/ncaa/11/22/college.football.poll/index.html
http://football.about.com/od/bowlchampionship/i/bcsvsplayoffs.htm
BCS/Playoffs Strengths and Weaknesses
BCS
Strengths:
PLAYOFFS
Strengths:
http://curveballsforjesus.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/bcs_300.jpg
http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2009/12/university_of_alabama_cancels.html
Strengths:
- Lots of Bowls
- A lot of teams are included in post season play
- Its a huge suprise
- They are spread out all over the country
- $$$
- Not a True Champion
- Non-BCS teams can not get into the National Championship game
- Losing one game has serious consequences. If you are going to lose one game, make it early in the season. Lose late and you are done. 2 losses still have a chance of making a BCS game. Anything more than that and you are out of luck.
- Every single game matters.
- Not fair to non-BCS teams
PLAYOFFS
Strengths:
- True Champion
- Fair to Non-BCS teams as well as BCS teams.
- Polls are still in play
- There is still a lot of $$$ to be had.
- Not as many teams are included.
- Not as much time to plan/schedule/travel to each bowl/game
- Some argue that it impedes on academics, but just today the University of Alabama announced that students will not have classes from Jan 6-8 to allow for students and faculty to travel to Pasadena for the title game.
http://curveballsforjesus.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/bcs_300.jpg
http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2009/12/university_of_alabama_cancels.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)