This is one of the top 5 games I have ever watched in my life! Boise State v. Oklahoma. 2006. Fiesta Bowl. Glendale, Arizona. Remarkable! Incredible! Every time I watch it, I get chills. Enough of me, here is how it all broke down. Boise State went 12-0 while Oklahoma went 11-2. The whole game was back and forth. The last two(the ladies..or people who love seeing two people in love could say 3)plays was absolutely remarkable. The first play being a hook and ladder to tie the score and send the game to OT. And to win the game for the Broncos Jared Zabransky faked it to the right with an empty hand then handed the ball off(behind his back) to RB, Ian Johnson for the touchdown! The next play, Johnson proposes to his longtime girlfriend and Boise State cheerleader, Chrissy Popadics. Check it all out below! It was such a great day for Broncos fans and made a great case for non-BCS teams to get into the BCS games for next year.
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Sure, they make BCS Bowls Occasionally, But Did you Notice..
THAT NONE OF THE NON-BCS TEAMS THAT PLAY IN A BCS BOWL HAVE EVER MADE THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME!? Over the past 9 years there have been 10 non-BCS teams go undefeated and not make the BCS National Championship Game. Of those 10, 6 did make a BCS Bowl though, a pretty weak consolation when a team that has 1 or 2 losses does make it to the National Championship game during that same year.
A parody of how the selection committee chooses the BCS participants.
No one Wants to Play Boise..For Good Reason
Here is the reasoning. It is pretty well known that teams from the WAC, CUSA, MAC, and MWC do not have as strong of schedules as say, teams from the Big 12, Big 10, SEC, or PAC 10. This is a contribution to why non-BCS teams are kept out of the National Championship game in Pasadena, CA. But just this football season, it was announced that Boise State was looking for some more BCS teams to fill their 2011 schedule, and no one wanted to play them(See quotation/article below). Boise State is a beast of a football program! Quite the dynasty.
"So what is on the table for the BCS opponent? The BCS team gets to stay at home (if they choose), they will be compensated, and they get to show their prowess over the lowly WAC one more time."
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/284222-boise-state-attacked-for-soft-schedule-but-no-bcs-teams-will-play-them
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/284222-boise-state-attacked-for-soft-schedule-but-no-bcs-teams-will-play-them
Boise State Broncos Team History
Junior College Record: 199-61-9 (.757)
University Record: 353-143-2 (.709)
WAC Record: 68-4 (.944)
Division I FBS Bowl Record: 5-4 (.555)
BCS Record: 1-0 (1.000)
National Championships (2)
1958 (JC), 1980 (I-AA)
Big Sky Conference Championships (6)
1973, 1974, 1975, 1977, 1980, 1994
Big West Conference Championships (2)
1999, 2000
Western Athletic Conference Championships (7)
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009
Example of the Different Polls: Harris, Coaches, BCS
BCS Standings - Updated: December 6, 2009 | |||||||||||
RK | Team | W-L | Harris | Coaches | CPU % | BCS | |||||
RK | Points | % | RK | Points | % | Prev | Avg | ||||
1 | Alabama | 13-0 | 1 | 2841 | .9968 | 1 | 1470 | .9966 | 1.0000 | 2 | .998 |
2 | Texas | 13-0 | 2 | 2721 | .9547 | 2 | 1409 | .9553 | .9200 | 3 | .943 |
3 | Cincinnati | 12-0 | 4 | 2467 | .8656 | 4 | 1280 | .8678 | .9300 | 5 | .888 |
4 | TCU | 12-0 | 3 | 2579 | .9049 | 3 | 1336 | .9058 | .8400 | 4 | .884 |
5 | Florida | 12-1 | 5 | 2395 | .8404 | 5 | 1240 | .8407 | .9100 | 1 | .864 |
6 | Boise State | 13-0 | 6 | 2358 | .8274 | 6 | 1216 | .8244 | .7800 | 6 | .811 |
7 | Oregon | 10-2 | 7 | 2130 | .7474 | 7 | 1096 | .7431 | .7800 | 7 | .757 |
8 | Ohio State | 10-2 | 8 | 2081 | .7302 | 8 | 1077 | .7302 | .5100 | 8 | .657 |
9 | Georgia Tech | 11-2 | 10 | 1787 | .6270 | 10 | 921 | .6244 | .6900 | 10 | .649 |
10 | Iowa | 10-2 | 11 | 1772 | .6218 | 11 | 918 | .6224 | .6100 | 9 | .618 |
11 | Virginia Tech | 9-3 | 12 | 1569 | .5505 | 12 | 829 | .5620 | .5900 | 12 | .568 |
12 | LSU | 9-3 | 13 | 1384 | .4856 | 13 | 718 | .4868 | .6400 | 13 | .537 |
13 | Penn State | 10-2 | 9 | 1800 | .6316 | 9 | 950 | .6441 | .3200 | 11 | .532 |
14 | Brigham Young | 10-2 | 14 | 1349 | .4733 | 14 | 702 | .4759 | .4100 | 14 | .453 |
15 | Miami (FL) | 9-3 | 15 | 1173 | .4116 | 15 | 611 | .4142 | .5000 | 17 | .442 |
16 | West Virginia | 9-3 | 18 | 730 | .2561 | 17 | 429 | .2908 | .4600 | 23 | .336 |
17 | Pittsburgh | 9-3 | 16 | 995 | .3491 | 16 | 506 | .3431 | .2500 | 15 | .314 |
18 | Oregon State | 8-4 | 19 | 722 | .2533 | 20 | 368 | .2495 | .3600 | 16 | .288 |
19 | Oklahoma State | 9-3 | 17 | 839 | .2944 | 18 | 404 | .2739 | .2200 | 20 | .263 |
20 | Arizona | 8-4 | 24 | 381 | .1337 | 23 | 237 | .1607 | .3800 | 0 | .225 |
21 | Stanford | 8-4 | 21 | 625 | .2193 | 21 | 253 | .1715 | .1500 | 24 | .180 |
22 | Nebraska | 9-4 | 20 | 631 | .2214 | 19 | 391 | .2651 | .0100 | 22 | .165 |
23 | Utah | 9-3 | 22 | 511 | .1793 | 24 | 183 | .1241 | .0700 | 25 | .124 |
24 | USC | 8-4 | 26 | 124 | .0435 | 27 | 42 | .0285 | .2900 | 18 | .121 |
25 | Wisconsin | 9-3 | 23 | 409 | .1435 | 22 | 247 | .1675 | .0500 | 0 | .120 |
Polls Explained: Harris, Coaches, BCS
I. Harris Interactive Poll (1/3rd)
Replaces the AP Poll. The first poll will be released September 27, then weekly through December 6. A team's score in the Harrispoll will be divided by 2,850, which is the maximum number of points any team can receive if all 114 voting members rank the same team as Number 1. Example: 2,850 / 2,850 = 1.0. If a team receives a total of 114 voting points, an average of 25th place, their BCS quotient of this component would be .04. (1.0 / 25 = 0.04).
II. Coaches Poll (1/3rd)
A team's score in the USA Today poll will be divided by 1,475, which is the maximum number of points any team can receive if all 59 voting members rank the same team as Number 1. Example: 1,475 / 1,475 = 1.0. If a team receives a total of 59 voting points, an average of 25th place, their BCS quotient of this component would be .04. (1.0 / 25 = 0.04).
(Better understanding the polls: In both human polls, voting members fill out their own top 25 rankings ballot. Each team receives 1-25 points in reverse order of the way they are ranked. The 25th place team on each ballot receives 1 point, 24th place gets 2 points, 23rd receives 3 points... first place receives 25 points. This inverse point order is also applied to the computer rankings.
In the Harris Interactive College Football Poll and USA Today Coaches Poll, a team will be evaluated on the number of voting points it receives in each poll. The number of actual voters, which can vary and has varied in the past, is figured into the computation on a weekly basis in stating each team's percentage of a possible perfect score.
III. Computer rankings (1/3rd)
The computer rankings percentage is calculated by dropping the highest and lowest ranking for each team and then dividing the remaining total by 100, the maximum possible points. (Example: the 6 rankers have Team A ranked 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, and 4. Take away the 2 and 4 which leaves an average of 3rd place. The BCS quotient of this component would be 0.92. (23 / 25 = 0.92).
Simplifying the formula
The percentage totals of the Harris Interactive Poll, USA Today Poll, and the computer rankings are then averaged. The teams’ averages are ranked to produce the BCS Standings.
A = Team is No. 1 in Harris Poll with all voters = 1.000
B = Same team is No. 1 in Coaches Poll with all voters = 1.000
C = Same team is No. 3 in Computer Rankings = 0.920
Result: (A+B+C)/3 = Total Score of 0.973
http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/bcs_explained.html
http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/polls
Replaces the AP Poll. The first poll will be released September 27, then weekly through December 6. A team's score in the Harris
II. Coaches Poll (1/3rd)
A team's score in the USA Today poll will be divided by 1,475, which is the maximum number of points any team can receive if all 59 voting members rank the same team as Number 1. Example: 1,475 / 1,475 = 1.0. If a team receives a total of 59 voting points, an average of 25th place, their BCS quotient of this component would be .04. (1.0 / 25 = 0.04).
(Better understanding the polls: In both human polls, voting members fill out their own top 25 rankings ballot. Each team receives 1-25 points in reverse order of the way they are ranked. The 25th place team on each ballot receives 1 point, 24th place gets 2 points, 23rd receives 3 points... first place receives 25 points. This inverse point order is also applied to the computer rankings.
In the Harris Interactive College Football Poll and USA Today Coaches Poll, a team will be evaluated on the number of voting points it receives in each poll. The number of actual voters, which can vary and has varied in the past, is figured into the computation on a weekly basis in stating each team's percentage of a possible perfect score.
III. Computer rankings (1/3rd)
The computer rankings percentage is calculated by dropping the highest and lowest ranking for each team and then dividing the remaining total by 100, the maximum possible points. (Example: the 6 rankers have Team A ranked 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, and 4. Take away the 2 and 4 which leaves an average of 3rd place. The BCS quotient of this component would be 0.92. (23 / 25 = 0.92).

The percentage totals of the Harris Interactive Poll, USA Today Poll, and the computer rankings are then averaged. The teams’ averages are ranked to produce the BCS Standings.
A = Team is No. 1 in Harris Poll with all voters = 1.000
B = Same team is No. 1 in Coaches Poll with all voters = 1.000
C = Same team is No. 3 in Computer Rankings = 0.920
Result: (A+B+C)/3 = Total Score of 0.973
http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/bcs_explained.html
http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/polls
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)